I feel that I don't really have to explain why this song is great - it is easily is one of the most original pieces I have heard in the last decade, at least. The use of a vocoder to produce an eerie digital a cappella sound, the effects, the form and arc of the song; all these things are packaged together to create a uniquely brilliant piece, from start to finish.
At its core, the song revolves around four chords - I, V, vi, and IV in A Major. Remember how I described these chords as a "guaranteed hit single" in my analysis of Aerosmith's "Cryin'?" Here they are again, in the same key no less. There a couple slight discrepancies, and I had to adjust the timing, but here is a mashup of both songs to demonstrate:
So these are tried-and-true chords. You would think that people's ears would tire of this progression but it keeps coming back, song after song. I have have no artistic gripe with this - diatonic chords are the foundation of Western music - but it is nice when musicians find new and interesting things to do with them.
So besides the obvious digital effects, what makes Imogen Heap's treatment so special? Mostly it is the thick harmonies. She uses a mix of simple triads and very close cluster voicings. Some of these chords happen by accident; one note will carry, by delay or reverb, into the next chord. Other times she is simply playing a big fat chord on the keyboard. Resisting the urge to transcribe and dissect every chord in the song, I'll do a play-by-play of some of my favorite moments.
00:00 The opening chords set the tone of the song - futuristic sounding major chords, almost metallic.
00:05 The word "what" has an added 9, making a very crunchy disonnance - apparently this is a dystopian future.
00:07 The word "hell", a D Major chord, has a B and an E in it, making it a 6/9 chord - pretty unusual already...
00:11 This chord is an accident, but I love it. The word "on" is an E chord, but the "A" from the word "go" carries into it by delay, so it has both the major 3rd and the suspension at once. Great sound.
00:36-1:11 This whole stanza has fantastic chord voicings throughout. Put on some good headphones and listen to what she does with the word "heavy."
1:12 "Hide and Seek" - this is one of the best moments of the song, and the first part that really wowed me. The D# in the V chord is so unexpected and vivid:
1:30 She does something similar on the second pass, this time swooping up to a half-diminished D# chord on the word "those."
1:40 On "they were" she uses almost every note in the scale, tightly clustered, making some kind of DMaj13 chord.
2:16 On "still life" she does the same thing, but thicker and louder, and with more effects. Great moment.
2:20 Interesting that she does not use the D# as she does in the first pass. (1:12, transcribed above)
2:36 This might be the best moment of the song. It gives me chills every time. I love the way she pulls the rest of the voices out and lets that high "B" sit by itself. It sounds like you're listening to the song underwater.
2:46 More thick, saturated IV chord here. I especially like how she clashes the C# right against the D in the melody on "were." Sounds like things are about to get real.
2:52 "Mmm, what you say?" This is the most famous part. The chords are less dense, the rhythm less rubato, but it is just a reworking of the original four chords. Instead of I, V, vi, IV she uses IV, I, vi, V.
3:23 From here to the end it goes back to the original four chords, with more dense clusters and interesting inversions.
As much as I would like to analyze every note and digital effect in this song, what really makes it great is the way it still gives me goosebumps, years and hundreds of listens later. I don't think there's one note I would change.
Yep on all accounts. Laughed at the mashup.
ReplyDeleteWhy This Song Is Great: Imogen Heap - Hide And Seek. Clusters! >>>>> Download Now
Delete>>>>> Download Full
Why This Song Is Great: Imogen Heap - Hide And Seek. Clusters! >>>>> Download LINK
>>>>> Download Now
Why This Song Is Great: Imogen Heap - Hide And Seek. Clusters! >>>>> Download Full
>>>>> Download LINK 7R
Thanks Kelly. Hide & Seek is exquisite & ecstatic. I too laughed at the mashup - thanks for noticing that astonishing similarity.
ReplyDeleteCan you talk about the timing / rhythm / use of time? I love that there is no percussion, and no bass line. I have seen some sheet music - was it Erik Satie? - that had no bars - no lines dividing time into equal units. Hide & Seek feels like it's experimenting in that way too -- but when I pay attention I think there is a consistent time structure throughout.
[Edit: I went on a hunt and mostly answered my own question...]
I just found sheet music on musescore: https://musescore.com/user/10669471/scores/5356255 - as transcribed/arranged by Noah Fettig. (Don't get confused by the timing of the chorus - see below about the one error in Noah's otherwise brilliant work.) That partially helps me see the timing. It seems to me that this song, compared to almost every song ever heard on a radio, has more ties - notes that bridge bar lines - and dotted notes (not staccato dots, duration-extending dots). I notice syncopation (I would call it that) - "Where ... are we(!)?". Saying the obvious, I notice a lot of sparsity - empty 'loose' timespace - and later a lot of relatively dense staccato. I'm sure there is much more going on in the timing - at micro and macro levels - than I'm noticing.
Wikipedia says she said she was influenced by "Her Song" by Paul Lansky. That music/soundscape is, to me, horrendous - not worth hearing, but if you wish, hear here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIUP_q6ojPY. Imogen heard Hell and turned it into Heaven.
HookTheory.com has a fine visualization -
https://www.hooktheory.com/theorytab/view/imogen-heap/hide-and-seek?node=1.5.6.4.
Without giving careful attention to this question when listening, I didn't know if Hide & Seek even had a chorus. HookTheory shows 5 parts: Verse, Pre-Chorus, Chorus, Bridge, Outro.
I would say the pre-chorus is just another verse, with a couple twists - I'd call it part A' (A-prime). HookTheory shows the parts but not how they are ordered -- it doesn't show that after the chorus the song returns to A' and then repeats the chorus.
So the structure is Verse, Verse, Chorus, Verse, Chorus, Bridge, Outro x2, or A A' B A' B C D. Each part is 16 4-beat bars - surprisingly standard (not the only standard, but a very popular standard).
Do you know if AABACD is a common structure?
Hook Theory says the verses have 108 BPM, the 'pre-chorus' (another verse?) 114, chorus 116, bridge 123, and the outro has 124 bpm. Do you know if they're right that the tempo changes? The MuseScore arrangement doesn't change tempo.
Do you know if Imogen is doing anything else magical / curious / unusual in the timing? If you wanted to dance to it (I do!), I don't know if trying to accent/step on the 1 of most musical bars would help.
-------
Note: Don't get confused by the chorus in Noah's Musescore arrangement. He gets the timing of the chorus wrong. It's different from Hook Theory's, and Hook Theory's perfectly matches Imogen's recording. Where Hook Theory gives the chorus 16 bars, Noah gives 13 bars for the first chorus and 15 and 1/4 bars for the 2nd chorus. (Otherwise his arrangement is astounding.)
I saw a couple other versions on Musescore say the music starts with BPM = 90, and later = 110, and later = 115. Noah's version shows BPM = 121 throughout. Noah's is generally better, at least in instrumentation and some of the pitches, but if you want to see one showing tempo changes, voila: https://musescore.com/user/5177366/scores/4507731
ReplyDeleteWhy This Song Is Great: Imogen Heap - Hide And Seek. Clusters! >>>>> Download Now
ReplyDelete>>>>> Download Full
Why This Song Is Great: Imogen Heap - Hide And Seek. Clusters! >>>>> Download LINK
>>>>> Download Now
Why This Song Is Great: Imogen Heap - Hide And Seek. Clusters! >>>>> Download Full
>>>>> Download LINK 5y