Friday, January 31, 2014

Wonderful Tonight - Eric Clapton. The Beautiful Tritone.

Before I dig into the Clapton, I want to look at a couple other songs. I've had this Mindy Gledhill song stuck in my head for a while now. (I'm not ashamed to admit I heard it a few years back in an underwear commercial - don't judge)


What really gets me, beyond the pretty singing and delicate arrangement, is the third chord. Of course, it is the IV chord. I've gone on at length on why the IV chord is often the most impactful, my theory being that it is between the I and V, where all the drama happens. What really makes it special in this song is how unexpected it is, due to the movement of the bass. The line starts on "do," then "ti", and when you'd expect it to keep moving stepwise to "la" it instead jumps right to "fa."


The root-position IV chord sounds so bold and warm and comes out of nowhere.

The jump from "ti" to "fa" is a tritone interval. This is the interval that most music students are taught to avoid when writing parts in theory and counterpoint classes. These classes typically focus on the choral writing of Bach, and the principles are consistent today. It may no longer be consider the Devil's Tone, but it is still a rare melodic interval. Despite several centuries of composers finding ways to break the "rules," the fact is that they still apply. Tritones don't move as smoothly as seconds, thirds, fourths and fifths. As a practical matter, there just aren't a lot of tritones available to the bassist in diatonic music. "ti" and "fa" are the only tones a tritone apart, so unless IV is going to vii, you won't hear it very often in Western pop music.

Another perfect example is "Take My Breath Away," the 80s ballad from Top Gun:


This song is great because it has both possibilities for contrast. In the verses the synth bass goes to the expected "la," then when they get to the chorus and the lyrics to land harder, it goes to the root position IV chord. (except the middle chorus, for some reason - maybe to build some anticipation for the final chorus) This makes the chorus dramatically prettier and creates contrast with the verse. It's brilliant writing - I could almost do a post on this song by itself.

Wonderful Tonight



That brings me to Eric Clapton's classic Wonderful Tonight. Most young guitar players learn this ballad pretty early on; it has an easy lead riff and the chords are simple enough for most beginners to play. Gigging musicians like myself have probably long since burned out on it, but it is always a reliable way to get people slow dancing.

Its simplicity belies some of the more nuanced brilliance of the song. For example:
  • Beginning drummers will often play eighth notes on the hi-hat, but the groove is much busier than that. My friend and drummer Andy Robbins pointed out that, with the ghost notes, almost every 16th note is played in the groove.
  • The organ, Rhodes, and rhythm guitar all play busy parts that fill out the song without sounding like they're stepping on each other. That's not easy!
  • I love the slight hesitation before the band comes back in at the end of the bridge, as he says "...how much I love you." That kind of thing is less common in the age of computerized click tracks.
And, of course, the chord progression has the wonderful "ti" to "fa" tritone. Although the bassist softens it with an approach note, the chords and effect are almost the same (and in the same key) as the Mindy Gledhill song above.

All theory aside - while I admit that I have burned out on Wonderful Tonight - I appreciate the nuances and, most of all, its simplicity. There are no vocal acrobatics or guitar wizardry. Anyone can sing it. Not lofty metaphors; it reads like a poem some guy wrote on a napkin for his wife one night. Sometimes little things make you happy. In my case, it's an unexpected root-position IV chord.


Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Bonus Post - O Holy Night Versions Reviewed

As I mentioned, the holidays are a busy time for us musicians, and so I never did write a followup to my O Holy Night post. I'm sorry kids, Santa didn't come this year...but he's here now!

What makes a performance of O Holy Night good? There are a handful of bullet points that I look for:
  • Faithfulness to the song. This is a classic carol, evocative of Christmas nostalgia for many - not a showpiece for egotistical divas.
  • Chords. I'm not opposed to reharmonization, but it should be thematically consistent. Don't use all of the original chords and then beef a couple just to be clever.
  • Dynamics. The song is placid to begin, and should build to the climax. You have to work hard to mess up the dynamics of this song.
  • The climax. This song more or less builds to the high note; it is the summit, so singers should pick a key in which they can nail it. Don't force it, don't milk it, just nail it.
With this in mind, here are my reviews of some well-known and less-well-known versions of O Holy Night:



1. Josh Groban

I hate to give Josh Groban credit, but this is pretty solid. My biggest gripe is that some of the orchestral swells outpace the song a little bit. The tympani, especially, seems to push the dynamics a bit much. A little minimalism in the arrangement would have been refreshing. A couple points lost for squaring up the form, but I guess that's pop music for you. He milks it a bit by tagging the chorus and holding the high note a little long but, eh, it works. 

Grade: A-



2. Luciano Pavarotti

Expectedly, Pavarotti is true to the form. Taking the song in Eb, he sets himself up for a true tenor's climax. There isn't much to complain about in terms of form and arranging.

That said, I feel like the heavy vibrato and constant forcing detracts from the gentleness of the song. On top of that, it seems like he's always pushing the tempo. The high note is very forced. It's not bad - I'd definitely play it in the background while decorating the tree - it just doesn't quite give me that warm Christmas feeling.

Grade: B+



3. Celine Dion

Did Celine Dion sing this? O holy crap. I would never buy a Celine Dion album, but she is good at what she does and I believe she has some of the best producers in the business. Her songs are always perfectly crafted, and they do climaxes right - I might even write about one of them someday.

On this one, however, I think they blew it. The whole first half is quite nice. I appreciate the simplicity and reserve. The choral interlude is a little corny, but I'll let it slide. I see no reason for a synth bass when they have a string orchestra handy, but that's barely audible. Then as it builds toward the climax, you start to hear the Celinisms come out in her voice. You know what I'm talking about.

Like Groban, she tags the climax - and man, does she milk it. It's not the worst thing in the world, but think it seals my opinion. Her recording starts out like a nice Christmas Carol and ends up like a Celine Dion song.

Grade: C



4. Celtic Woman/ Chloe Agnew

I really didn't want to do this one, but it's the top hit on YouTube and has over 11 Million views. I don't know why these corny, overproduced PBS specials bug me so much. They're just so...sanitary. There's nothing wrong with the arrangement, it's just really, really artificial. They make it look like some magical medieval congress in - is that a freaking castle? - while these photogenic wood nymphs sing perfect angelic tones. If anyone was actually at one of these "performances" I guarantee it sounded nothing like what you hear. They go back, correct pitches, rerecord parts, etc...basically airbrush every hint of impurity out of it until it is a perfectly digestible flavorless syrup for public consumption.

I mean, I guess that's what the Groban and Dion versions are, but there's something about the visual presentation that really rubs me the wrong way. The real sin is that it completely abandons the tone of the carol. Jesus was born in manger, not in a castle in front of privileged, white bread ticket holders.

Grade: C-



5. Kings College

I need a little detox after that last one, so we're going to church. John Rutter arrangements occasionally rub me the wrong way, but this one is solid. I love the organ; it's warm, supportive and never gets in the way. Best of all, there is no studio magic here, just beautiful cathedral acoustics.

Grade: A



6. *NSYNC

You might think that I would hate this one - especially since I had to do a full transcription of it years ago - but I don't. It's poppy, studio perfect, deviates far from the original, and doesn't really build to the climax very much.

However, I still think it's a really good arrangement. It appears to have been arranged by producer Robin Wiley, who has some major vocal writing skills. The reharmonizations are really nice and it has some great moments, including a smooth modulation. Also, they do a pretty decent job of it live, without any pitch correction. I don't think I'd put it on as we open presents on Christmas morning, but as a standalone it's not half bad.

Grade: B



8. Mariah Carey

Ok...they're going for a gospel thing here...nothing wrong with that. The melismas are a bit much, but actually pretty reserved for Mariah. The gospel choir works. Organ solo in the middle? Thats...weird. It sounds like she's going for it too early in the second chorus, but as we all know Mariah has an extra whistle octave to work with. Sure enough, right at the climax, there it is: the Double B. For those looking on a piano, here it is:

What can I say? It's a good arrangement, all the pieces fit, the climax is great. It also has nothing to do with Christmas or the original tone of the song. As a novelty, I'll give it the same treatment as *NSYNC.

Grade: B



That's about all I can handle. I hope the holidays were great for everyone, here's to a whole new year of picking apart the best (and worst) songs!

Monday, December 16, 2013

O Holy Night - Adolphe Adam.

This is a busy time of year for musicians, but I wanted to find time to make a Christmas-themed post. I am often asked what my favorite Christmas song is, and it is difficult to choose. I love the whole Charlie Brown Christmas album, but when pushed for a favorite I feel inclined to go back further.

Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas is an easy pick for me; it has great chords (especially for jazz musicians), a good form and its dynamics, from the beginning to the climax, almost play themselves. It would be my bronze medal choice.

I have a soft spot for Silent Night. It is so simple, so serene, and yet so evocative. When I hear, or sing it, I feel as though I'm in the 19th century, watching snow fall by candlelight. Silent Night is my silver medal choice.

I think my gold (and I admit that my choice could change depending on the day) is O Holy Night. Done well, it gave me goosebumps when I was ten, and gives me goosebumps now.

A little history on the piece: it was written by French composer Adolphe Adam to the poem Minuit, chrétiens by Placide Cappeau. The song was supposedly written in 1847, but the earliest score I could find (from the Library of Congress) is dated 1871. It appears to be a score by Adam himself - or at least a faithful reproduction. The score is stamped "1ST.COPY." and says "Only Correct Edition." over the title, so I believe it to be as close to the original source material as we can get.

One point that interested me about the piece was finding out what the original key was. It seems that even in the 19th century it was transposed to a variety of keys, presumably to accommodate different singing ranges. Because it covers over an octave and a half, the piece really needs to sit in the sweet spot for whomever is singing it. I found versions in C, D, A and Eb published before the turn of the century. Most versions were in Eb. The original score said that there were versions in Eb for sopranos and tenors, and in C for altos and baritones. (I'm not sure many altos and baritones would be excited about the high G near the end)

Looking over the score, it is surprising that the chords have gone largely untouched over the last century and a half. Some modern interpretations might reharmonize it a little, but the original chords are pretty much as you know them today. The melody, on the other hand, has a has seen some variation over the decades. For one thing, while the accompaniment is all triplets - basically in 12/8 - the melody contains no triplets.



In many modern versions the song is just written in 12/8, with the melody in triplets as most people sing it. Also, it seems that Adam was a fan of melodic variation, as can be seen in the score above. Each verse in the original scores is a little different, but most are close to the melody as we know it today. I was surprised to see many of the common modern variations and embellishments in the earliest scores.

Why it's Great

Now on to what I like about this song. The number one reason is intangible; like many carols, it evokes early childhood memories of Christmastime. I'm sure we had this song playing in the background every year during the holidays, as I hung stockings and decorated the tree with my family. It has a calm, stirring warmth to it that I can't explain.

From a theory standpoint, there are a lot of curiosities that make the song stand out. The use of a melody that is in straight 4/4 over an accompaniment that is in 12/8, while common in the Romantic era, is unusual in popular music. Also, the dynamic range is quite large, with Adam's score jumping from pp to ff at the "Fall on your knees" section.

Then there is the issue of form. This song can mess with a lot of singers because, like me, they tend to hear the first line ("O Holy Night") as the downbeat. In actuality this phrase is a pickup. That means that, between stanzas and verses, the singer must wait a measure and a half before coming in, though the impulse will be to start on the downbeat.

It also means that the first two stanzas are 5 measures long. I enjoy that such an unusual length flows so naturally. The full form is: 1 (one measure intro), 5 (verse stanza 1), 5 (verse stanza 2), 4 (pre-chorus), 8 (chorus), 4 (chorus tag). That's definitely unique.

I also like the slinky way the verse moves from Eb to Gm by turning the I chord into an augmented sixth chord in Gm. (curiously, Adam, a Frenchman, used the German augmented sixth, not the French!):



Last, what really sells the song is the climactic "Fall on your knees" section that builds to the high note. It is a great vocal showpiece and I especially like how the high note is first "mi", then the very high (Bb) "sol" is at the end. The way it carries into the following measure is beautiful. As "mi" it becomes the 9 in a 9-1 suspension over the ii6 chord. Then as "sol" it becomes the 4 in a 4-3 suspension. I would argue that the former is actually prettier, as it creates the sound of an unexpected IV chord with a 7-6 suspension. As I mentioned in my Ode to Joy post, there's just something about the IV chord.

I'm not sure that I would want this to be the only Christmas song I listen to for the rest of my days. If I had to pick just one, it would probably be Silent Night. But when I'm in the right mood, nothing beats O Holy Night. Because of its popularity, the song has been covered by countless artists. If I have time before Christmas, I'll review a handful of them.


Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Prince - Kiss. Two Things.

It is difficult to find Prince songs online, as he seems to be quite aggressive and litigious about copyrights and online distribution of his material. Nevertheless, I have found a video for reference below. Enjoy it while it lasts!


I wouldn't say I'm a huge Prince fan, but I have to give credit where it is due. He is pretty talented and "Kiss" is one of the more interesting treatments of the I-IV-V chords. There are a couple things I particularly like about this song:

1. The Bass

I know I always turn to the bass, but in this case it is the lack thereof that interests me. I can't think of many other (any?) pop/rock songs that have drums, but no bass. As always I am a fan of "Less is More" production, and I give extra points for subtractive decisions that are particularly counterintuitive. Somehow this one works. There is a very heavy synth bass drum and some lowish synth parts, but other than that there is very little low end in this song.

2. The Chord...

...the opening chord, that is. There are a lot of notes in that chord, so I couldn't resist figuring it out. As it turns out it is more or less impossible on the guitar. This is what I hear:


There may be some very creative ways to achieve this chord on the guitar for those with especially dexterous hands, but I doubt they would sound right and would be difficult to land in the middle of the a performance. On a second pass it is obvious that there are (at least) two guitars here. This is how I would break them down:


The first guitar is a lot cleaner, almost a completely dry sound. There are some major wah/phase effects on the second part. I did a quick and dirty recording of both parts:

Guitar 1:

Guitar 2:

Both Parts:


If you don't have a couple guitarists in your band, I would just go with the voicing that seems to be most popular on the internet:


You're only missing the C#, which is barely audible to begin with. That's good enough for live shows,  but it is fun to go back and dig into the original recording to see what makes it so unique. Hats off to you Prince, you ridiculous, talented weirdo.

Monday, November 18, 2013

John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman - My One And Only Love. Back to its Roots.


The collaboration of John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman might easily make my top 10 jazz albums. If I need to relax, this is the one to put on.

What makes it so mellow? The rich baritone and calm sax are a big part, but I believe the answer is in the rhythm section. For jazz musicians, My One And Only Love is standard repertoire and, while I might be a little tired of playing it, I never tire of the Coltrane/Hartman recording. So I put on my headphones to try to see what made that version So Great.

The answer is in the bass, as it often is. Most musicians learn this song from The Real Book, which looks like this:


Note the crowded walk-down in the first measure. It's a nice contrast to the ascending melody, but also maybe a little busy; it seems to distract from the melody a bit. There's also a series of inverted chords in the following measures. There's nothing wrong with them, but I feel that maybe it sounds a bit too clever for the subject matter.

The Coltrane/Hartman version uses far fewer chords, with a more straightforward I-vi-ii-V in the first two measures. As I listened I realized that not only were the chords simpler, but the bassist never plays an inversion. This is unusual for jazz bassists. Every chord is in root position, except for the short pedal in between the sax and the vocal sections. I don't think I've ever heard another bassist give the song that treatment. It was clearly something Jimmy Garrison was doing deliberately. 

I also enjoy that they use the raising 5th progression in the bridge, versus the descending 7th that always seems to clash with the melody. It is refreshing to find new ways to play old songs, so for those interested, below are the Coltrane chords to My One And Only Love. I tried to use simple chords rather than McCoy's thicker voicings and alterations, so look to the recording if you want to build on it*.


Get the PDF here.

* A few hints on McCoy's voicings: he plays an A13 on the second chord, plays a 13(#11) on the D7 chords (upper structure, think guide tones in the left hand, E triad in the right) and usually alters the B7 in the bridge. (again, upper structure - try guide tones in the left hand, F or G triads in the right)


Friday, November 15, 2013

Beethoven - "Ode to Joy." One note.



First, a quick intro on the piece that most people know as "Ode to Joy": The familiar melody is actually the prevailing theme in the fourth (final) movement of Beethoven's 9th (final) symphony. Its lyrics come from a poem by Friedrich Schiller. The theme occurs throughout the movement in a variety of ways, but is most commonly known for the triumphant moment that occurs at 12:55 in the video above. It is interesting to note that the theme does not occur until late in the piece, and that it neither opens nor closes the movement.

Because of its wide popularity, it is common for beginning students to learn the "Ode to Joy" melody on the piano. I understand that these beginner arrangements are often simplified for easy consumption, but it is striking how much of the impact is stripped out. Here is one example of a basic arrangement:


and another in C:


I will explain why these reductions fail, but first, what is it about this music that gives us goosebumps? There are many obvious reasons: the melody is simple but stately and revolves over the tried-and-true I, IV and V chords; the combination of a chorus and an orchestra is hard to beat; it is familiar, having been shared from generation to generation, featured in commercials and movies and holiday concerts.

Often goosebumps can't be explained through music theory. This is probably one of those times. But there is one note that really makes the piece work for me, that is often neglected in simplified versions of the piece. The harmony uses the flat seven, shown here in the orchestral score:


I have no idea why that note is so powerful, but I have a couple soft theories. For one, it is a bit unusual. We often gravitate to diatonic harmonies, like the parallel thirds in the first example above. There is a novelty to the dominant I chord. It also leads to an excellent double suspension in the soprano and alto parts. Listen to the difference:

First the piece with regular parallel thirds (this does create a double suspension over the IV chord that is quite pretty)



Now with the flatted seven:



My other theory about why this note is so powerful is that it leads to the IV chord. There's just something about the IV chord. The I chord is home, and the V chord leads you home, but IV is neither of those; IV is the meat. It is where the drama happens. That's my best guess as to why it gives so many people goosebumps. I and V establish the key, but IV is the action. All I know is that I love that "C" in the altos.

There are a handful of other important/interesting details that are missed in the arrangements above, all things I think one should look for when playing an arrangement:
  • It should be in D Major. Not G, not C
  • It should go to the IV chord in the 5th measure, not V
  • The bridge (not shown above) should have two secondary dominant chords, V/ii and V/V
  • Despite the straight rhythm of the melody, it is actually in 6/8
Of course there is nothing wrong with simplifying a piece for beginners, but I think at some point in one's career they need to start getting it right, and this is a piece that deserves to be done right.

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Lynyrd Skynyrd - Sweet Home Alabama. Nuance.


Any working musician who has been at it for more than a few years has probably gotten their fill of Sweet Home Alabama. After playing it a couple hundred times it loses its luster. I myself could probably go the rest of my life without playing or hearing it again. But when I go back and listen to the original, it is striking how many tiny details there are, and how few cover bands seem to play them. This is 3-chord rock done right, and I have a special appreciation for the little nuances that make this song a classic.

A quick note from my soapbox: so many musicians today grew up playing in jam sessions, winging it, and have a background in jazz. (like myself) It is easy for us to treat a rock song like a set of chords to make things up over, like a typical lead sheet. But rock music is often much more carefully composed than that, and the details can be what sell it to the listener, whether they realize it or not. If a specific bass part is repeated throughout the tune, that is part of the song. If the drummer plays a very specific groove, that is part of the song. If the rhythm guitar plays a very consistent strumming pattern, that is part of the song.

It's one thing if you're just learning the song well enough to get by, or just taking a quick request. You can play D, C and G chords, nail the chorus and 99% of your drunken audience will be thrilled. But if you're going to be playing Sweet Home Alabama more than occasionally, and you really want your band to stand out, it's worth digging a little deeper.

To that end, I have created a checklist with points (0-100) for all of the cover bands out there. This list assumes you're getting the basics already - groove, tempo, form, lyrics, etc. High points are given to the details that are a) obvious and b) integral to the song. See how you do!


20 points - The Chorus Groove

This is the first part that every band should make sure they get. The verses have a simple eight note + dotted quarter rhythm in the bass, but there are offbeats in the chorus that almost everyone in the band should be hitting:


20 points - The F Chord

If you're playing a 3-chord song and there is a fourth chord that shows up only a few times, you sure as heck better play it! Don't make muffins and forget the blueberries. The F chord occurs at the end of the first chorus, going into the (first) guitar solo - another crucial part. The second time it occurs is very similar, with the "ooh, ooh, ooh" after "love the governor." People will sing that part, so you should be playing it. Don't be lazy! The third time it occurs is just like the first time, but near the end as they go into a second chorus.

15 points - The Pre-Chorus Lick

A lot of bands miss this because it is a little tricky and less overt than the main guitar riff, but the whole band plays it, which is a good sign that you should too:


15 points - The Guitar Interlude

This interlude occurs between the first and second verse, before you've reached the chorus at all, and after the guitar solo. It is mostly guitar-driven (make sure to get the harmonics!) but the best bands will include the piano support during this section. The bass doubles part of the riff on the second pass. The drummer starts hitting the snare in this part, then goes back to the cross-stick during the verse.

10 points - The Piano

Speaking of the pianist, not every band has one, but for those who do it plays an important part in this song. They may sound capricious, but the following riffs occur the same way during every verse. Riff One comes after the first and third stanzas, Riff Two after the second.
Piano Riff 1
Piano Riff 2

10 points - The Bass under the Solo

The bass part gets a lot busier under the guitar solo, and because it is the same every time, I know that he is not just making things up. It is part of the song. Here it is:


10 points - Other Guitar Parts

I'm not going to transcribe every guitar part in this song, but the rhythm guitar part during the verses is really interesting. (with good headphones you can hear it very clearly on the right side) It is quite syncopated and provides an interesting rhythmic counterpoint to the very straight lead part. The guitar part during the chorus is also very specific and nearly as important as the opening riff.

Extra Credit 1 - The Backup Vocals

It is beyond the scope of most bands to have the time and personnel to cover all of the backups throughout this song, but there are a lot there for the ambitious cover band. There are responses to the lyrics, thick harmonies and backups during the solo. At the very least, bands should harmonize the chorus.

Extra Credit 2 - "Alabama"

It's very subtle, but at the end of the second chorus, before the guitar solo, the singer says "here I come, Alabama" and the band hits the syllables in "Alabama" with him. It's the tiniest of details, but it would blow my mind if I saw a cover band actually do that part.


That's my checklist. To be fair to musicians everywhere, getting all of these things right would require a lot of time spent on a song on which many of us are, as I mentioned, more than a little burned out. I listened to an old recording of my band playing this song and I doubt we'd have scored much over 50. But for people who really love Skynyrd, or who just love the thrill of getting things right, there is a lot to sink your teeth into.